After a Rigged Review Process, SFUSD Just Approved Its New Ethnic Studies Curriculum
The board voted 6-1 to commit to a curriculum validated by a rigged process. But litigation is incoming.
SFUSD just voted 6-1 to adopt a new ethnic studies curriculum through what critics call a rigged review process — and a legal challenge was filed the same night. That fight is part of a broader pattern: San Francisco's institutions keep making expensive commitments they can't deliver on, from 465 affordable housing units with no funding plan to courts that haven't reported case data to the state in five years.
The board voted 6-1 to commit to a curriculum validated by a rigged process. But litigation is incoming.
Federal data projects a 15.7% enrollment collapse by 2031, the worst of any major state. Meanwhile, Idaho and Florida are growing. This isn't inevitable—it's what happens when the cost of housing skyrockets and the quality of education declines.
The billion-dollar ideology behind the violence finally produced what it always promised.
The Mission spent eight years in working groups designing housing that SFMTA admitted was only ever a future possibility — never a funded commitment. Then the city cut 365 units and called it a compromise.
For five years, SF courts haven't reported a single data point to the state—even as they resolve fewer and fewer cases.
Waymo cleared every safety bar and got exiled to the Rental Car Center. Meanwhile, Uber and Lyft keep 800,000 monthly trips.
SB 1074 bans Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta from rigging their platforms against startups. The fight DC couldn't win lands in Big Tech's backyard.
SF makes restaurant owners navigate four agencies and wait six months to serve wine legally. Two blocks away, stolen bottles trade with impunity.
SF's head of 'equity' steered millions to her live-in partner's nonprofit while the system spent more on propaganda than education.
SF Superior Court Judge Linda Colfax has a proven track record of giving violent criminals light sentences.