Skip to content
Housing & YIMBY Merit & Excellence Budgets & Fiscal Policy San Francisco

California Will Lose a Million Students

Federal data projects a 15.7% enrollment collapse by 2031, the worst of any major state. Meanwhile, Idaho and Florida are growing. This isn’t inevitable—it’s what happens when the cost of housing skyrockets and the quality of education declines.

By Garry Tan 6 min read
California Will Lose a Million Students

TL;DR

California is projected to lose 15.7% of its public school students by 2031, nearly 3x the national rate, driven by a housing crisis and declining school quality.

California is projected to lose 15.7% of its public school students by 2031. That’s nearly one million kids, gone from a system that currently educates 5.9 million. When the dust settles, federal enrollment data shows California will have fewer students than Texas had in 2019.

This can’t simply be shrugged off as a nationwide trend. California’s student exodus will come to nearly three times the national average decline of 5.5%. Forty states and D.C. will lose students, but California is losing them faster than any other large state in America.

Students and families aren’t leaving randomly. This exodus is a predictable result of a growing affordability crisis and a declining quality of education. And it has consequences: a massive decrease in student numbers will hit school districts, California’s political power on the national stage, and every child-focused service that families rely on.

As a father raising children and navigating the California school system, this trend is as troubling to me as it is infuriating. The numbers convey what’s been clear to me for some some time now: California isn’t prioritizing families — in fact, it’s actively chasing them away.

Where Students Are Going

While California shrinks, other states are filling classrooms. Federal projections show Idaho gaining 10.8% enrollment by 2031. Florida adds 3.2%. Utah, Alabama, Tennessee, all growing. The South as a region will decline just 1.8%. California: 15.7%.

Census data analyzed by Bellwether shows California lost 341,866 people to other states in FY21-22, the largest outflow in the country. Florida gained 249,064. PPIC demographers charted the longer trend: from 2010 through 2024, almost 10 million people moved from California to other states while only 7 million moved in. The state has lost residents to other states every single year since 2001.

This isn’t an inevitability — it’s a consequence of sweeping policy failures.

A Growing Affordability Crisis

Birth rates declined 14% nationally between FY13 and FY22. Every single state experienced the drop. But California’s enrollment decline is nearly three times the national average. Birth rates don’t explain the gap. Out-migration does.

Young families are the most price-sensitive demographic in the housing market. When the median home crosses $800K, families with school-age kids are the first to leave. When housing is blocked, rents skyrocket, six figures becomes “low income,” and families do the math.

California’s 175-year era of explosive population growth is over, with the state plateauing at roughly 39.5 million. The state is set to lose congressional seats and electoral votes after the 2030 census. The enrollment collapse and the political power loss flow from the same failure: we didn’t build housing.

California loses approximately $1.4 billion per year in personal income tax revenue to out-migration, a rate three times pre-pandemic levels. That’s money that could fund schools. Instead it funds Florida’s growth.

Declining Educational Quality

The prohibitive cost of living pushes families out of California. But what happens inside the schools pushes remaining families to private alternatives.

SFUSD eliminated 8th grade algebra in 2014 in the name of equity. The results? In 2015, 48 percent of eighth grade students met or exceeded the state math standard, but just 13 percent of Black and 21 percent of Latino students did so. In 2023, 40 percent of students overall but only 4 percent of Black and 13 percent of Latino students met or exceeded the standard.

The reforms designed to close racial gaps made them catastrophically worse. Federal Judge William Alsup called SFUSD’s equity-based consent decree “counterproductive” in achieving diversity. Schools resegregated anyway. And 30% of San Francisco children now attend private school, nearly four times the state average. SFUSD has lost 4,000 students, 8%, since 2019-20. The district is insolvent and closing schools.

Behind these failures stands the same political force: the California Teachers Association, which pulled in $239 million in 2024 in revenue, dwarfing nearly every other special interest in the state. It was union leadership, in addition to other advocates, that pushed the removal of 8th-grade algebra, fought merit-based admissions at Lowell, and blocked honors and AP courses — all while claiming to support working families. It is ironic that now, those same working families are leaving California, deterred by the disastrous policies that teacher’s unions helped foster.

Private schools would have far lower enrollment if public schools focused on merit and achievement instead of watering down the curriculum for the sake of virtue signaling.

The Vicious Cycle

Every family that leaves takes their per-pupil funding with them. The schools get worse. And more families leave.

From FY13 to FY22, national public school enrollment fell 1%—but total staffing increased 20%, adding 607,569 new positions. Administrative staff alone rose 36%. The adults in the building kept multiplying even as the children disappeared.

The dam is breaking. Boston Public Schools is considering closing half its schools. Jefferson County, Colorado shuttered 16 in one year. Rochester, New York approved 11 closures. The $190 billion in federal COVID relief that masked this mismatch expired in September 2024. No more buffer.

Charter schools absorbed 1.4 million students nationally (+62%) while district schools lost 1.8 million (-4%). And the cascade doesn’t stop at K-12. California high school graduates peaked at 454,768 in 2024 and are projected to fall to 362,165 by 2043. Sonoma State already saw a 31% enrollment decline. The pipeline is collapsing from the bottom up.

Every year California chooses not to build, another cohort of families does the math and moves to Boise or Austin or Tampa. Those students aren’t coming back. Neither is the $1.4 billion in annual tax revenue. Neither are the congressional seats lost when the House of Representatives undergoes reapportionment. Neither is the generation of kids who’ll grow up somewhere else, paying taxes, building communities, and getting an education in states that actually make it possible to raise a family.

Take Action

Read the full Bellwether enrollment analysis

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

Welcome to Garry's List.
We explain the world from a builder's lens.

Want to join the citizen's union? Apply in 5 minutes.