An Atlanta detective solved 35 homicides last year using Flock Safety cameras—7 times what elite detectives typically achieve—while San Francisco faces a lawsuit trying to ban the same technology that caught a hit-and-run driver who injured a local resident. Meanwhile, violent offenders are flooding SF's Drug Court program at unprecedented rates, with defense attorneys moving to divert cases nearly four times more often than in 2023, and the city's worst-performing judges are poised to win reelection unopposed unless qualified challengers file by the February 4 deadline. The contrast highlights a stark choice between cities embracing proven crime-fighting technology and those where legal loopholes and unaccountable judges are undermining public safety.
Flock Safety just 7x'd what even the best homicide detective in America can do. The technology works. The question is whether your city will use it.
A drunk driver hit her and fled. Flock cameras found them. Now privacy activists want to shut it all down.
A startup founder who actually delivers results vs. Sacramento's endless theater. California finally has a real choice.
Violent offenders are flooding a program designed for petty crimes. Public defenders call it "treatment." The numbers call it fraud.
Feb. 4 deadline looms. If qualified attorneys don't file to run, voters won't even get a choice.
Grandpa Vicha's killer just walked on murder charges. It's time to build a new generation of AAPI leaders who won't sell out their elders.
Californians voted for public safety. The state legislature decided their votes don't count.
The Feb. 4 deadline to challenge soft-on-crime judges is days away—and almost no one has stepped up.
State lawmakers gutted accountability for youth crime. Now kids are shooting classmates and beating tourists.
After five years, Vicha Ratanapakdee's family learns their father's life was "negotiable." Six hours of deliberation was all it took.