Skip to content

Los Angeles

Los Angeles is under mounting scrutiny over its homelessness spending after a former hotel purchased for $10 million in 2020 sat empty for four years and ballooned to $20 million in costs — producing zero occupied units. The scandal is fueling a broader debate about LA's housing strategy, with mayoral candidate Nithya Raman pushing a rent-freeze-plus-construction platform that developers and economists say is mathematically incoherent. Both stories point to the same problem: the city keeps spending more and housing fewer people.

Why Is Los Angeles Spending $20M on 32 Empty Housing Units?
Homelessness & Drug Crisis State Capacity

Why Is Los Angeles Spending $20M on 32 Empty Housing Units?

Los Angeles emptied a building that was already housing people. Four years and $625,000 per unit later, it still houses nobody.

Read more →
The Left's Housing Math Doesn't Add Up
Housing & YIMBY New York City

The Left's Housing Math Doesn't Add Up

NYC and LA progressives promise rent freezes plus new construction. Every city that's tried gets ghost apartments instead.

Read more →