Media & Narrative · State Capacity & Accountability · Merit & Excellence

SFUSD Punished a Teacher for Protecting Student Journalists

A San Francisco court ruled the district broke the law. The story hits close to home for me.

By Garry Tan · · 3 min read

Lowell High School - where administrators tried to silence student journalism and lost. The court ruled they broke the law. Photo: EdSource

Source: buff.ly

TL;DR

SF Superior Court ruled that SFUSD illegally retaliated against journalism teacher Eric Gustafson for protecting student reporters. Censorship of the truth is power speaking to truth.

When administrators punish teachers for protecting student journalists, they prove exactly why student journalism matters. A San Francisco court just delivered that lesson to SFUSD.

The Court’s Verdict: SFUSD Broke the Law

San Francisco County Superior Court ruled this week that Lowell High School administrators illegally reassigned journalism teacher Eric Gustafson for doing exactly what he should have done: defending his students’ First Amendment rights.

According to EdSource, Gustafson had taught journalism at Lowell since 2017. Principal Jan Bautista removed him from his journalism class and reassigned him to teach English after students published a story about alleged verbal harassment by teachers. The students were doing real journalism—holding power accountable—and the administration’s response was to punish the teacher who let them.

Educator Eric Gustafson had sued the San Francisco Unified School District in June after Lowell High School Principal Jan Bautista removed Gustafson from his journalism class, which he had taught since 2017, to teach English courses. The removal followed a student-reported story in which other students alleged verbal harassment by unidentified teachers, prompting student uproar and confrontations with suspected teachers, according to Gustafson.
The highlighted text tells the story: a teacher removed for doing his job—protecting students' right to report the truth. Photo: @incitafusio·Source: x.com

The court found this violated California’s Journalism Teacher Protection Act, which explicitly prohibits schools from retaliating against educators who defend student press freedoms. Now Bautista must reinstate Gustafson within 30 days.

My Experience: Censorship Is Power Speaking to Truth

This case resonates deeply with me because I lived the same dynamic decades ago.

In high school, my journalism teacher killed my story about how Fremont Unified School District had far more severe punishments for our working-class high school compared to the district’s “crown jewel” school. The story wasn’t wrong—it was inconvenient. The powerful didn’t want it told, so it got buried.

I never forgot that lesson: censorship of the truth is power speaking to truth.

The Lowell case shows the same pattern playing out again. When student journalists reported something uncomfortable—alleged harassment by teachers—the institutional response wasn’t to investigate the problem. It was to silence the messenger. Remove the journalism teacher. Make the story go away.

SFUSD’s Pattern of Dysfunction

This isn’t an isolated incident. It fits a broader pattern at SFUSD where bureaucrats and administrators prioritize politics and self-protection over students and teachers.

Lowell has faced ongoing controversies around admissions standards being watered down. When the school temporarily moved to a lottery system, approximately 100 students failed out because they weren’t academically prepared for the rigor. The district has dealt with $113 million budget deficits and faced a 2022 school board recall driven by parents fed up with dysfunction.

New leadership has made some progress reducing central office bloat, but incidents like this show the institutional culture hasn’t fully changed. Teachers and students still face intimidation when they challenge the bureaucracy.

Student journalism exists precisely to hold institutions accountable. When administrators try to silence it, they prove why it matters. California’s Journalism Teacher Protection Act exists for exactly this reason—and it worked. The court got it right.

Now SFUSD needs to learn the lesson.

Follow @garrytan for more.

Take Action

Read the full EdSource report

Read

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

Welcome to Garry's List.
We explain the world from a builder's lens.

Want to join the citizen's union? Apply in 5 minutes.