Elections & Voting Integrity · Media & Narrative · San Francisco · New York City

Most Democrats Want Normal. Nationally It’s Going Bad. In San Francisco, There’s Hope.

The moderate majority is real but an 11% fringe is hijacking primaries. But not in San Francisco. Here’s why.

By Garry Tan · · 7 min read
The poll’s finding that only 11% of Democrats hold far-left positions. In San Francisco, Chair of the San Francisco Democratic Central Committee Nancy Tung holds the keys to what could be a much bigger return to common sense for Democrats everywhere.

Source: latimes.com

TL;DR

A new poll of 2,593 Democrats confirms the median Democrat is a moderate who wants effective governance, not activist theater. The 11% “Woke Fringe” dominates primaries and discourse anyway.

Thirty-eight percent of Democrats say the party should move toward the center. Twenty-two percent say further left. That’s nearly 2-to-1, and it cuts across every demographic in the coalition: Black voters (39% center), Hispanic voters (35%), white voters (41%), men, women, college grads, and non-grads. A new Manhattan Institute poll of 2,593 registered Democrats and 2024 Harris voters just confirmed what many of us have been saying for years. The median Democrat is a moderate. The loudest voices in the room represent a tiny fraction of the party.

The 11% Running the Show

The poll identifies three blocs inside today’s Democratic coalition: Moderates (47%), Progressive Liberals (37%), and what the researchers call the “Woke Fringe” (11%). That last group, self-identified Democratic Socialists and Communists, is the youngest faction (average age 43), the most conspiratorial, and reports significantly higher rates of poor mental health (25% vs. 14% for Moderates).

{"visual_description": "This is a screenshot of a report or article page with black text on a white background. The layout is clean and text-heavy, structured with bullet points and sub-bullets using a hierarchical format. It appears to be from a political research report or analysis document that categorizes the Democratic coalition into three ideological blocs. The design is minimalist with no images or charts — purely typographic. The document uses bold text to highlight key faction names ...
The three blocs of the Democratic coalition. The Woke Fringe is just 11% of the party, but dominates discourse. Chart: Manhattan Institute·Source: x.com

The Woke Fringe is 11% of the party but 90% of the noise. They’re the only faction where a majority (58%) wants to go further left. By 63% to 27%, all Democrats say future candidates should prioritize effective governing over fighting Trump and Republicans. Even the Woke Fringe agrees on that.

We saw this exact dynamic in San Francisco. The old DCCC opposed the school board recall that 70% of voters supported. They blocked the Westside Family Democratic Club from being chartered because the word “family” was called “a common dog whistle on the right.” A tiny minority was overriding the vast majority. Now we have 2,593 data points proving it’s a national pattern.

The Median Democrat Is Not Who Twitter Thinks

On issue after issue, the coalition’s actual positions look nothing like what dominates social media.

Regarding illegal immigration, which statement comes closest to your view?

LEGEND:
- After years of open borders, there are so many illegal immigrants that our top priority should be deporting as many as possible, by whatever methods are necessary
- We need to significantly reduce the number of illegal immigrants, but this must be done carefully, with due process, so innocent people aren't wrongly detained or deported
- Many illegal immigrants have lived peacefully since their initial violat...
Only 11% of Democrats support zero deportation enforcement. The activist position is a fringe position. Chart: Manhattan Institute·Source: x.com

Immigration: only 11% say there should be no focus on deporting illegal immigrants. 65% favor skills-based legal immigration. Even within the Woke Fringe, only one in four favors zero enforcement. Crime: 71% to 18% support aggressive prosecution of gun crimes. 55% say police are essential. 74% reject political violence. Economics: only 14% say billionaires should not exist. 78% want the system preserved or reformed. On transgender policy: 59% support parental notification at schools, and 52% say 18 should be the minimum age for medical interventions.

Even on housing, where Democrats broadly support building more, 51% still prefer thorough permitting processes over faster approvals. The Abundance agenda is right on the merits, but it hasn’t yet won the messaging fight inside the Democratic base.

These aren’t Republican talking points. These are the median Democratic voter’s positions.

The Conspiracy Gap Nobody’s Talking About

The generational data is where this poll gets genuinely frightening. Among Democrats aged 18-29, 24% say the Holocaust was greatly exaggerated or didn’t happen as historians describe. That’s eight times the rate of Democrats over 65 (3%). Twenty-eight percent of young Democrats think NASA faked the moon landing. Thirty-eight percent view October 7th as an inside job.

For each, indicate whether you think it is definitely false, probably false, probably true, definitely true, or if you're not sure

Legend: Definitely true | Probably true | Not sure | Probably false | Definitely false

Russian President Vladimir Putin has compromising information on Donald Trump and uses it to sway Trump's policy positions
+45 | 19% | 45% | 16% | 13% | 6%

COVID-19 leaked from a laboratory in China
+14 | 15% | 33% | 18% | 19% | 15%

The assassination attempt against Donald T...
The generational conspiracy data is the poll’s real alarm bell. Chart: Manhattan Institute·Source: x.com

Sixty-eight percent of self-identified Communists in the Democratic coalition support political violence. Twenty-nine percent of Democratic Socialists agree. These are the people showing up to low-turnout primaries and party committee meetings while the moderate majority stays home. This isn’t “kids being kids.” This is a radicalized minority with outsized structural influence over who wins nominations.

Mamdani Is Teaching Democrats to Lose

Want to see what the 11% looks like when it captures a primary? Look at New York. Zohran Mamdani won the mayoral race in November 2025 with 50.78%, opened his victory speech quoting Eugene Debs. Bernie Sanders immediately called his campaign “the direction in which the Democratic Party should be moving.”

This is a color photograph taken at what appears to be a press conference or public speaking event. The main subject is a young man with dark hair and a beard, smiling broadly while speaking into a handheld microphone. He is wearing a navy blue blazer, white dress shirt, and a blue tie with a gold/yellow dot pattern. The setting appears to be an ornate indoor venue with warm wood-toned walls visible in the background. Several other people are blurred in the background, including women in red ...
Mamdani, the democratic socialist NYC mayor, is now the face Republicans will paste on every Democrat in every swing district in 2026.·Source: aei.org

House Republicans called him “the new face of the Democrat Party.” Trump called him “a 100% Communist Lunatic.” The AEI’s Ramesh Ponnuru identified the real danger: it’s not that Mamdani turns off swing voters, though he will. It’s that he teaches the activist class the wrong lesson.

What actually worked in November 2025? Abigail Spanberger, a centrist with a CIA background, won the Virginia governor’s race. Mikie Sherrill won New Jersey. The moderates cruised. The socialist scraped by in one of the bluest cities in America and handed Republicans their attack ad for every swing district in 2026.

Democrats lost 6 of 7 presidential elections from 1968 to 1988. At the California Democratic Convention in February 2026, the “Spineless Caucus” dressed as sea slugs demanding candidates “be Mamdani.” They have learned nothing. It’s the Dukakis years all over again.

Nancy Tung Showed the Way First

Nancy Tung was the person who radicalized me into politics. I couldn’t understand how district attorney at the time, Chesa Boudin, was allowing our Asian American elders to be maimed and murdered with no accountability. On a walk in 2021 through Noe Valley, she laid out the hard left progressive machine that had taken over the Board of Supervisors, the DA office, and the school board. And in that walk was the blueprint for Nancy’s leadership: we would recall them. We would win elections. We would re-take the SF Democratic Central Committee. And all of these things came to pass.

A career prosecutor and daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, she ran for DA in 2019 and lost to Chesa Boudin. The Board of Supervisors then blocked her Police Commission nomination because she was seen as too pro-police.

This is a professional photograph showing a woman in profile view, captured in what appears to be a formal or official setting. She has long dark hair and is wearing what looks like a blue garment. The woman is wearing small pearl or white stud earrings and appears to be looking off to the side with a serious or contemplative expression. The background is blurred with neutral tones, creating a professional portrait-style composition. The lighting and image quality suggest this was taken by a ...
Nancy Tung, career prosecutor and SF Democratic Party chair, led the moderate revolution that the data now validates. Photo: SF Chronicle·Source: latimes.com

She was the lone common sense voice on the old DCCC, voting for the recall campaigns when the rest of the committee opposed what 70% of voters wanted. In March 2024, a moderate slate won 18 of 24 DCCC seats and elected her chair.

Politico reported that Tung’s SF Democrats proposed five resolutions: fully staff police departments, relax housing regulations, close learning gaps for Black and Hispanic students, and explore age limits on officials. The LA Times profiled her as leading the rise of Democratic moderation. Her diagnosis: “so much of party politics has been largely performative and not really relevant to the everyday lives of working people.” That’s exactly what this poll shows nationally, backed by 2,593 data points.

The Path to 2028

The primary numbers confirm the electability anxiety. Harris leads at 23%, Newsom at 20%. AOC sits at just 7% despite 60%+ favorability among Democrats. They like her energy. They don’t trust her to win. That gap between favorability and vote share captures the entire dynamic of a party that knows what it should do but keeps letting the loudest faction drag it somewhere else. Newsom beats AOC by 25 points head-to-head. Two-thirds agree a Democratic woman would “have a very hard time” winning in 2028. Fifty-six percent say the same about a Democratic Socialist.

If the 2028 Democratic Presidential primary election were held today, for whom would you vote?
Among respondents who said they are 'Extremely likely' or 'Very likely' to vote

Kamala Harris - 23%
Gavin Newsom - 20%
Pete Buttigieg - 8%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - 7%
Josh Shapiro - 5%
Mark Kelly - 4%
Cory Booker - 2%
JB Pritzker - 2%
Jon Stewart - 2%
Andy Beshear - 2%
Gretchen Whitmer - 2%
Mark Cuban - 1%
Wes Moore - 1%
Jon Ossoff - 1%
Ro Khanna - 1%
Chris Murphy - 1%
Ruben Gallego - 0%
Stephen ...
AOC has 60%+ favorability but only 7% of the vote. Democrats like her but don’t trust her to win. Chart: Manhattan Institute·Source: x.com

Barack Obama sits at 70% very favorable, towering over the entire field. 55% support an outsider running for president. The party’s most beloved figure governed from the center. The voters want that again.

Nancy Tung proved the fix in San Francisco: organize the moderates, take back the party infrastructure, focus on what actually matters to people’s daily lives. Safe streets. Housing. Schools. Not resolutions about child labor in Africa’s chocolate trade while your own kids fall behind in math. The Woke Fringe wins because they show up to every primary and every committee meeting. The 47% moderate majority stays home.

That’s why you’re on this site. We’re not staying home anymore, and we’re going to the ballot box, and we’re organizing the way Nancy Tung and our moderate reformers organized in 2021. In five years we did it. And we’re going to keep going. If you didn’t become a member of Garry’s List yet, you should fill out your application now.

If it can be fixed in SF, we will fix it everywhere in America.

Take Action

Join Garry's List. We ask that you write about yourself so we can match you with the people who care about what you care about.

Comments (3)

Sign in to join the conversation.

Mark Dinan Mark Dinan Member 1 day ago

I’ll add that many progressive ideas around governance are a lot like the practice of using bleeding and leeches to heal patients. No matter how much they believe it, these practices harm and do not help the patient. Pick your policy around policing, housing, governance and the metaphor applies.

Mark Dinan Mark Dinan Member 1 day ago

Progressives have run California politics like PacMan without any ghosts on the board. People with jobs/careers/businesses/kids generally only pay attention to national elections, and meanwhile at the state and local level truly batshit crazy ideas have taken hold around housing, education, policing, and other important issues. I’m on council in East Palo Alto and the moderate vision is crazy popular after decades of terrible governance. There are so many obvious and easy fixes to the city that the progressives simply couldn’t be bothered to do: fix parks, improve street lighting, invest in safe streets with roundabouts and speed humps, do code enforcement, etc. “Getting good stuff done” should be the priority, and sadly, it has not been.

Carolyn Wilson-Bennett Member 3 days ago

I am so tired of reading & hearing that Mamdani is the future of the Democratic Party. The SF story should be blasted across the podcasts, Substack, and yes, MSM.

Welcome to Garry's List.
We explain the world from a builder's lens.

Want to join the citizen's union? Apply in 5 minutes.