Chronicle Blames Remote Work for Mall Death. The Real Killer? Crime.
San Francisco Centre’s last tenants get evicted while the Chronicle pretends shoplifting and drug use had nothing to do with it.
Source: sfchronicle.com
Source: sfchronicle.com
TL;DR
The SF Chronicle attributes the Westfield Mall’s collapse to “pandemic and remote work” while deliberately omitting the shoplifting and open drug use that actually drove shoppers away.
The Chronicle ran yet another piece on SF Centre’s death spiral, carefully attributing the mall’s collapse to “pandemic and remote work.” What they conveniently left out? The shoplifting and open drug dealing that made shopping there feel like navigating a dystopian hellscape.
Archived tweetYou left out the rampant shoplifting and open drug use right outside that scared away all the shoppers. đ¤ˇââď¸ @rolandlisf @sfchronicle https://t.co/uU92bdWYqy
T Wolf đ @Twolfrecovery January 06, 2026
T Wolfâa recovery advocate who was formerly homeless himselfâcalled out what everyone who’s walked past the mall knows: it wasn’t Zoom calls that killed Westfield. It was the crime.
The Final Eviction
According to the Chronicle, the new owners are now suing to evict the three remaining holdouts: Executive Order bar, Shoe Wiz repair service, and a salon. That’s all that’s left of what was once the city’s biggest mall.
Notice the framing: “pandemic and remote work.” Not a single mention of the rampant theft and drug use that anyone with working eyes could observe on Powell Street. It’s journalistic malpractice by omission.
The Real Story They Won’t Tell
Here’s what the Chronicle doesn’t want you to connect: Stonestown Mall in the Sunset is thriving. Valley Fair in San Jose is packed. If e-commerce and remote work were killing malls, they’d all be dying. But they’re notâonly the ones surrounded by open-air drug markets and consequence-free shoplifting are going under.
Archived tweetIf we canât say the obvious thing in the legacy media, what is the point of the legacy media? Cover up the mistakes of the state? https://t.co/rj225VssqW [Quoting @Twolfrecovery]: You left out the rampant shoplifting and open drug use right outside that scared away all the shoppers. đ¤ˇââď¸ @rolandlisf @sfchronicle https://t.co/uU92bdWYqy
Garry Tan @garrytan January 06, 2026
If the legacy media can’t state the obviousâthat allowing drug traffickers to operate freely in public spaces and letting shoplifters walk out with merchandise destroyed downtown retailâthen what exactly is the point of local journalism? To provide cover for failed progressive policies?
What Comes Next?
The lender group has hired CBRE to sell the property, but as the article notes, “any reimagining of the property into another usage could be prohibitively expensive.” A full closure would cut expensesâand leave another gaping hole in downtown SF.
Twenty-five years of progressive legislation made it nearly impossible to open or renovate retail downtown. SF is the only major downtown in North America that didn’t add substantial housing. And now the Chronicle wants to blame Zoom for the consequences.
Executive Order bar owner John Eric Sanchez told the Chronicle he’d fight the eviction. “We’re trying to hold out as long as we can,” he said. But holding out against what? The crime that drove away customers, or the media that refuses to name it?
Follow @garrytan for more.
Related Links
-
T Wolf on what the Chronicle left out (@Twolfrecovery)
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.